Procedural Science · Human Rights · Jurisdiction

Center for Advanced Studies in Procedural Law, Human Rights, and Decision Theory

An autonomous academic institution dedicated to research and advanced legal education in Procedural Science, Human Rights, and Decision Theory. The School fosters dialogue among procedural doctrine, case law, Comparative Law, and International Law, bringing together academia and the justice system.

Escola Capixaba de Processo · Vitória, Espírito Santo
The School

The Manifesto of the Escola Capixaba de Processo

Contemporary jurisdiction cannot be understood solely through the traditional categories of procedural doctrine.

The expansion of precedent systems, the growing complexity of collective and structural litigation, and the internationalization of human rights protection call for new ways of understanding procedure, judicial decision-making, and the effectiveness of judicial protection.

It is within this field of inquiry that the Escola Capixaba de Processo is situated: a center for advanced studies dedicated to the investigation of Procedural Law from a national, international, and comparative perspective, with particular attention to decisional rationality, the Theory of Precedent, and the incorporation of international human rights parameters into Brazilian jurisdiction.

Through dialogue among jurisdictions — engaging with the case law of Brazilian courts, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and other relevant jurisdictions — the School seeks to bring Brazilian procedural doctrine closer to international legal debate.

We act autonomously to:

  1. Investigate the rationality of decisions and precedents: examine models of judicial reasoning, the integrity of precedent systems, and methods for identifying the ratio decidendi, from the perspective of Decision Theory and Comparative Law.
  2. Promote dialogue between national jurisdiction and Human Rights: examine the relationship between Brazilian jurisdiction, the case law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and international human rights treaties, with particular attention to conventionality control.
  3. Develop procedural responses to complex and structural litigation: investigate procedural models suited to collective, structural, environmental, and climate-related litigation, considering national, international, and comparative standards of judicial protection.
03 RESEARCH LINES Research — What We Study

Three research lines, one integrated understanding of contemporary jurisdiction

Line I

Theory of Decisions, Precedents, and Comparative Procedure

Investigation of the foundations of judicial decision-making and precedent systems, with particular attention to reasoning, the identification of the ratio decidendi, jurisprudential coherence, and dialogue between the Civil Law and Common Law traditions.

Line II

Human Rights, Conventionality Control, and International Jurisdiction

Study of the impact of International Human Rights Law on national jurisdiction, with emphasis on the Inter-American System, conventionality control, access to justice, and dialogue between national and international courts.

Line III

Structural Procedure and Complex Litigation

Investigation of procedural instruments for addressing collective, multipolar, and structural conflicts, particularly those related to the protection of vulnerable persons and groups and to social, environmental, and climate-related conflicts of high complexity.

The lines define what we research. The Network's axes define how we turn that research into training, cooperation, and scientific output.

HOW WE COOPERATE Network of Advanced Studies

Knowledge built through cooperation

The Network of Advanced Studies in Procedure, Human Rights, and Jurisdiction constitutes a permanent space for scientific cooperation among researchers, laboratories, research groups, universities, training institutions, and institutions of the Justice System.

Coordinated by the Escola Capixaba de Processo, the Network promotes joint projects of advanced training, research, and scientific production, preserving the institutional autonomy and research lines of each participating institution or unit.

The Network organizes its activities around three complementary axes:

Axis I

Training and Advanced Studies

Advanced study cycles, seminars, advanced courses, workshops, programs with visiting scholars, and academic exchange initiatives.

Axis II

Research and Jurisprudential Systematization

Interinstitutional projects, thematic groups, comparative studies, jurisprudential research and systematization, and the preparation of scientific reports.

Axis III

Scientific Production and Dissemination of Knowledge

Working papers, books, articles, case-law commentaries, scientific events, and dissemination of research results.

Universities, graduate programs, laboratories, and research groups may take part in the Network through specific projects, programs, or initiatives, with their institutional identity, scientific autonomy, and respective research lines preserved.

The Network seeks to establish a permanent space for the circulation of knowledge between academia and the Justice System, connecting scientific research, advanced legal training, and the contemporary challenges of jurisdiction.

04 AREAS Academic Programs

Advanced training, research, and scientific production

The School develops academic programs linked to its research lines and to the Network of Advanced Studies' projects, integrating specialized training, research, and scientific production.

Its offerings include Advanced Study Cycles, extension and continuing-education courses, seminars, research groups, and specialization programs, developed directly or in cooperation with partner academic institutions, subject to applicable requirements.

Advanced StudiesAdvanced study cycles and immersive thematic seminars.
Specialized TrainingExtension courses and specialization programs.
Applied ResearchResearch groups and cooperative projects.
PublicationsWorking papers, reports, and scientific output.